Regionalization: Do You Have A Plan?

Service distribution and optimization planning, including the design and execution of regionalization strategies, doesn’t occur through osmosis.  It necessitates a deliberate process that encourages innovative thinking and ensures candid discussion of critical issues and available options.  The numerous challenges of regionalizing health services are more easily conquered when guided by a well-defined framework.  Regardless of how services are or will be redistributed across a system, there are critical elements that should be integrated into any framework for regionalization.

  1. Building a system-wide base of cultural readiness.  Members of hospital staff are often loyal to and identify with the organization, campus, or building within which they work.  Motivating leaders, providers, and staff to think beyond their silos and more systematically is arguably the most difficult task on this list.
  2. Establishing clear ground rules and transparent decision-making criteria.  Establishing the decision-making path and criteria to be followed will help communicate an unbiased, stakeholder-inclusive, and system-centric approach to service distribution.  It also promotes accountability and systematic rigor in the decision-making process.
  3. Organizing efforts by service line; start with those that have the greatest potential and build a compelling business case upon cost and quality.  Instead of making sweeping changes, systems must thoroughly evaluate each service, build a business case for redistributing a service line across the system, and take manageable steps toward implementing regionalization strategies.  It is incumbent upon system leaders to present a fact-based case for change, as well as a clearly articulated vision for the future of the system and individual hospitals.
  4. Including and engaging stakeholders at all levels.  Staff reaction to regionalization efforts varies, often depending on whether their facility is losing or gaining services.  Engaging stake-holders at all levels allows those affected to voice their questions and concerns while providing leadership with the opportunity to communicate the rationale behind such decisions.  Staff buy-in can be best attained with participation in the discussion and decision-making processes.  Additionally, reaching out to the community allows the system to proactively address commitments and agreements that may have been made earlier related to the level of services offered.
  5. Setting deadlines for reporting and recommendations.  This is not a transition that can be managed periodically or during spare time.  Firm timetables and high levels of accountability are critical in tackling the hard work of service distribution.  Often, external expertise is critical to success.
  6. Communicating system decisions, strategy, and progress on a regular basis.  Open and decisive communication with staff and stakeholders regarding plans can mitigate rumor and uncertainty about the system’s stability in this climate of change.

A growing number of health systems are faced with the reality of addressing overlapping services, declining patient volumes, and high costs.  Regionalization strategies, though difficult, represent an opportunity to strategically align services in a manner that promotes accessible, high-quality care at sustainable costs.

To learn more about regionalization, read the Insight on our Web site.

This entry was posted in Clinical Integration, Hospital Consolidation, Service Regionalization, Strategic Planning and tagged , , , , , , , by Kevin Kennedy. Bookmark the permalink.

About Kevin Kennedy

As a consultant since 1990, Kevin has assisted dozens of hospitals, health systems, and medical groups with solving their strategic, financial, and operational problems. He has particular expertise in operations improvement, hospital/physician relationships, and physician compensation planning. His most recent client experience includes assisting hospitals with service line and enterprise-wide strategic planning, working with health systems to define the operational relationships with member hospitals, and facilitating multiple transactions, including hospital/hospital and hospital/physician acquisitions. He is a frequent speaker before industry associations and has received the Yerger/Seawell Article of the Year award for outstanding contribution to professional literature from the Healthcare Financial Management Association (HFMA). Kevin holds a bachelor of science degree in business administration from The University of Arizona and a master of business administration degree from The University of Chicago.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s