Meaningful Use Incentive and Penalty Scenarios: Medicare

CMS recently released its attestation data from the meaningful use (MU) program, generating widespread speculation about MU dropout rates and the future of attestation trends.  Dropout rates from Year 1 to Year 2 for Medicare are roughly 17%, and surveys have indicated that about 15% of providers do not plan to attest in Stage 2.  Given these statistics, providers should consider how skipping an attestation year could lead to future penalties and diminished incentives.

Hurry-and-Attest

Guide to Medicare Penalty and Incentive Rules

MU incentives are paid soon after completing attestation, often in the same year.  However, penalties are implemented with a lag of 2 years through 2017. So, dropping out in 2013 means an eligible professional (EP) will see a penalty in 2015.  And not starting at all by 2014 means an EP will see penalties in both 2015 and 2016 (as a result of not attesting in 2013 and 2014 respectively).  This creates dozens of incentive/penalty permutations across the Medicare award years.

The first penalties begin in 2015, while incentives are paid out across 5 years beginning in 2011 and ending in 2016.  For providers who attested originally with the Medicare program, there are a few key program rules that determine the impact of dropping out:

  • Penalties increase by 1% each year unless fewer than 75% of EPs nationally achieve MU by 2018; otherwise, the penalty caps at 5%.
  • Medicare penalties only grow in years that EPs do not attest.  So, if the first dropout year is 2013, the penalty in 2015 is 1%.  If the provider resumes participation and attests in 2014, the EP avoids any penalties in 2016. Dropping out again in subsequent years incurs another penalty, implemented 2 years after the next dropout year, with the penalty increasing by 1%.
  • Dropout years count toward the maximum allowed number of years of program participation for both incentive payments and attestation requirements.  So, an EP who attests in 2011 and then drops out in 2012 forfeits the 2012 payment and cannot make it up.  The EP can attest again in 2013, based on the stage and year requirements of the third year of participation, and receive the third payment year incentive.

Medicare Penalty and Incentive Scenarios

The graphic below shows the impact of attestations and dropout years across a variety of EP scenarios.  There are dozens of incentive and penalty scenarios that providers should understand when considering MU participation and dropouts in order to properly anticipate CMS compensation.

Scenarios-3

The scenarios presented above only include Medicare attestation considerations.  The impact of Medicaid/Medicare switches and Medicaid dropouts will be discussed further in a future post.

Given the variety of potential combinations of incentives and penalties, EPs should review the guidelines and scenarios carefully prior to skipping a year of attestation or dropping out of the MU incentive program altogether.

This entry was posted in EHR/EMR, Healthcare IT, Healthcare Reform, Legislative & Regulatory Issues and tagged , , by Erin Mastagni. Bookmark the permalink.

About Erin Mastagni

Erin works in ECG’s Managed Care practice. Her experience with healthcare IT, business intelligence (BI), and population health projects for providers, payors, and public health agencies allows her to help clients address strategic healthcare IT issues through activities such as organizational assessments, governance modeling, accountable care program development, and strategic planning. Prior to joining ECG, Erin was a thought leader in the data analytics practice at Mercer LLC, a national HR consulting firm, where she worked to develop intellectual capital to benefit all clients using claims data warehouses and analytics to manage population health. Erin has a bachelor of arts degree in economics and politics from Claremont McKenna College and a master of health administration degree from Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine.

6 thoughts on “Meaningful Use Incentive and Penalty Scenarios: Medicare

  1. Pingback: 2012 Meaningful Use Dropout Rates May Foreshadow Future Participation | ECG Management Consultants, Inc.

  2. Pingback: MU Incentive & Penalty Scenarios · askjoy.net

  3. Pingback: Prepare for Meaningful Use Stage 2: Step 2 | ECG Management Consultants, Inc.

  4. Pingback: Promoting Engagement Through Patient Portal Adoption | ECG Management Consultants, Inc.

  5. Pingback: [Infographic] Meaningful Use Incentive and Penalty Scenarios: Medicaid | ECG Management Consultants, Inc.

  6. Pingback: Meaningful Use Incentive and Penalty Scenarios: Medicaid | ECG Management Consultants, Inc.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s