The Consolidation Fallacy

Navigating healthcare’s evolution to a value-centric payment system – and doing so in a financially responsible manner – is one of the greatest challenges organizations now face.  The reality is, not all hospitals or provider groups will survive this transition on their own.  Instead, many will need to band together with strategic partners to collectively combat increasing competitive, economic, and regulatory pressures.  As a result, there is a prevailing system-wide perception that consolidation, by way of merger and acquisition, is the only answer for organizations seeking to achieve scale, enhance clinical integration, expand market reach, and preserve financial strength.  Although consolidation may be an appropriate course of action for certain systems, the belief that it’s the most appropriate path for all organizations is a fallacy.  What seems to be lost in this climate of consolidation is that scale and integration is effectively achieved in a variety of ways.  Consolidation is merely one strategy among many that can put organizations in a position to realize their immediate and long-term goals.

Each organization possesses its own unique circumstances, characteristics, culture, and priorities. Accordingly, positioning strategies need to be clear and tailored to fit a specific vision.  Partnerships, affiliations, joint ventures, network formation, and participation in accountable care organizations represent alternatives to consolidation that, when utilized effectively, can bring significant benefits to network partners as they position for the future.  These benefits include:Benefits_14M02D18The merger and acquisition of hospitals, provider groups, and service providers may align with the long-term positioning strategies of some systems.  However, not all organizations have the resources, infrastructure, or desire to pursue consolidation strategies, and might be best served by using alternate vehicles in driving toward an optimal end state.

To learn more about positioning strategies, read the Insight on our Web site.

This entry was posted in Healthcare Reform, Hospital Consolidation, Network Development, Strategic Planning and tagged , , , , , , , by Steve Messinger. Bookmark the permalink.

About Steve Messinger

Steve, who is Managing Partner of ECG, has extensive experience in strategic and business planning, business development, mergers and acquisitions, and managed care. He assists health systems, academic medical centers, and medical groups with developing and implementing strategies that drive competitive advantage, and he is an effective adviser to boards and executives who are managing the challenges and implications of transformational change. Steve has been a featured speaker on healthcare strategy and hospital/physician relationship issues for a variety of professional associations, trade groups, health systems, and physician groups. He has been published in several healthcare journals, including Modern Healthcare, Modern Physician, hfm (a publication of the Healthcare Financial Management Association), Group Practice Journal, and Health Care Strategic Management. He earned a master of health services administration degree from The George Washington University and a bachelor of science degree in clinical sciences from Cornell University.

3 thoughts on “The Consolidation Fallacy

  1. Pingback: Five Key Components of an Optimal Organizational End State | ECG Management Consultants, Inc.

  2. Pingback: Affiliation: Too Early Is Better Than Too Late | ECG Management Consultants, Inc.

  3. Pingback: Closing the Book on 2014 | ECG Management Consultants, Inc.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s